Home
|
The Society
|
Membership
|
Board of Directors
|
Multinational Finance Journal
|
Annual Conferences
Search
Date Range
in
Title
Author
Abstract
Full Text
Keywords
All Years
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
to:
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Forthcoming Articles
Published Articles
Volume 26 (2022)
Volume 26, Numbers 3 & 4
27-59 (September/December 2022)
Volume 26, Numbers 1 & 2
1-26 (March/June 2022)
Volume 25 (2021)
Volume 25, Numbers 3 & 4
(September/December 2021)
Volume 25, Numbers 1 & 2
(March/June 2021)
Volume 24 (2020)
Volume 24, Numbers 3 & 4
Pages 119-266 (September/December 2020)
Volume 24, Numbers 1 & 2
Pages 1-117 (March/June 2020)
Volume 23 (2019)
Volume 23, Numbers 3 & 4
Pages 141-272 (September/December 2019)
Volume 23, Numbers 1 & 2
Pages 1-139 (March/June 2019)
Volume 22 (2018)
Volume 22, Numbers 3 & 4
Pages 119-254 (September/December 2018)
Volume 22, Numbers 1 & 2
Pages 1-118 (March/June 2018)
Volume 21 (2017)
Volume 21, Number 4
Pages 211-283 (December 2017)
Volume 21, Number 3
Pages 133-210 (September 2017)
Volume 21, Number 2
Pages 49-132 (June 2017)
Volume 21, Number 1
Pages 1-48 (March 2017)
Volume 20 (2016)
Volume 20, Number 4
Pages 273-354 (December 2016)
Volume 20, Number 3
Pages 181-271 (September 2016)
Volume 20, Number 2
Pages 85-179 (June 2016)
Volume 20, Number 1
Pages 1-83 (March 2016)
Volume 19 (2015)
Volume 19, Number 4
Pages 223-313 (December 2015)
Volume 19, Number 3
Pages 149-221 (September 2015)
Volume 19, Number 2
Pages 77-147 (June 2015)
Volume 19, Number 1
Pages 1-75 (March 2015)
Volume 18 (2014)
Volume 18, Numbers 3 & 4
Pages 169-336 (September/December 2014)
Volume 18, Numbers 1 & 2
Pages 1-167 (March/June 2014)
Volume 17 (2013)
Volume 17, Numbers 3 & 4
Pages 149-369 (September/December 2013)
Volume 17, Numbers 1 & 2
Pages 1-148 (March/June 2013)
Volume 16 (2012)
Volume 16, Numbers 3 & 4
Pages 155-301 (September/December 2012)
Volume 16, Numbers 1 & 2
Pages 1-154 (March/June 2012)
Volume 15 (2011)
Volume 15, Numbers 3 & 4
Pages 157-296 (September/December 2011)
Volume 15, Numbers 1 & 2
Pages 1-156 (March/June 2011)
Volume 14 (2010)
Volume 14, Numbers 3 & 4
Pages 153-317 (September/December 2010)
Volume 14, Numbers 1 & 2
Pages 1-151 (March/June 2010)
Volume 13 (2009)
Volume 13, Numbers 3 & 4
Pages 155-321 (September/December 2009)
Volume 13, Numbers 1 & 2
Pages 1-154 (March/June 2009)
Volume 12 (2008)
Volume 12, Numbers 3 & 4
Pages 157-312 (September/December 2008)
Volume 12, Numbers 1 & 2
Pages 1-155 (March/June 2008)
Volume 11 (2007)
Volume 11, Numbers 3 & 4
Pages 157-322 (September/December 2007)
Volume 11, Numbers 1 & 2
Pages 1-156 (March/June 2007)
Volume 10 (2006)
Volume 10, Numbers 3 & 4
Pages 153-305 (September/December 2006)
Volume 10, Numbers 1 & 2
Pages 1-151 (March/June 2006)
Volume 9 (2005)
Volume 9, Numbers 3 & 4
Pages 131-269 (September/December 2005)
Volume 9, Numbers 1 & 2
Pages 1-130 (March/June 2005)
Volume 8 (2004)
Volume 8, Numbers 3 & 4
Pages 141-274 (September/December 2004)
Volume 8, Numbers 1 & 2
Pages 1-139 (March/June 2004)
Volume 7 (2003)
Volume 7, Numbers 3 & 4
Pages 107-230 (September/December 2003)
Volume 7, Numbers 1 & 2
Pages 1-106 (March/June 2003)
Volume 6 (2002)
Volume 6, Numbers 3 & 4
Pages 131-258 (September/December 2002)
Volume 6, Number 2
Pages 65-130 (June 2002)
Volume 6, Number 1
Pages 1-63 (March 2002)
Volume 5 (2001)
Volume 5, Number 4
Pages 225-311 (December 2001)
Volume 5, Number 3
Pages 155-224 (September 2001)
Volume 5, Number 2
Pages 87-154 (June 2001)
Volume 5, Number 1
Pages 1-86 (March 2001)
Volume 4 (2000)
Volume 4, Numbers 3 & 4
Pages 159-288 (September/December 2000)
Volume 4, Numbers 1 & 2
Pages 5-153 (March/June 2000)
Volume 3 (1999)
Volume 3, Number 4
Pages 223-282 (December 1999)
Volume 3, Number 3
Pages 147-221 (September 1999)
Volume 3, Number 2
Pages 71-145 (June 1999)
Volume 3, Number 1
Pages 1-70 (March 1999)
Volume 2 (1998)
Volume 2, Number 4
Pages 245-310 (December 1998)
Volume 2, Number 3
Pages 167-244 (September 1998)
Volume 2, Number 2
Pages 85-165 (June 1998)
Volume 2, Number 1
Pages 1-83 (March 1998)
Volume 1 (1997)
Volume 1, Number 4
Pages 255-324 (December 1997)
Volume 1, Number 3
Pages 169-254 (September 1997)
Volume 1, Number 2
Pages 93-168 (June 1997)
Volume 1, Number 1
Pages 1-80 (March 1997)
Forthcoming Articles
()
General Information
()
Published Articles By Year
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
1997 - 2023
Published Articles for Year 2006
Download Article 125.36 Kb
The Determinants of Foreign Currency Hedging by U.K. Non-Financial Firms
Multinational Finance Journal, 2006, vol. 10, no. 1/2, pp. 1-41 |
https://doi.org/10.17578/10-1/2-1
Amrit Judge
, Middlesex University, U.K.
Corresponding Author
Email: A.Judge@mdx.ac.uk
Abstract:
For 366 large non-financial U.K. firms, this paper reports the factors that are important in determining their decision to hedge foreign currency exposure. The results provide strong evidence of a relationship between expected financial distress costs and the foreign currency hedging decision and more significantly the foreign currency only hedging decision. These findings seem stronger than those found in similar studies using U.S. data. The paper argues that this might be due to the fact that several U.S. studies include in their non-hedging sample other hedging firms, such as firms using non-derivative methods for currency hedging and interest rate only hedgers, which might bias the results against the a priori expectations. However, it might also be due to a country specific institutional factor, that is, U.K. firms face higher expected costs of financial distress due to differences in the bankruptcy codes in the two countries
Keywords : corporate hedging; foreign currency hedging; derivatives, financial distress; foreign currency debt; bankruptcy codes
View in Bib TeX Format
View Cite Format 1
View Cite Format 2
Download Article 153.35 Kb
Australian On-Market Buy-backs: An Examination of Valuation Issues
Multinational Finance Journal, 2006, vol. 10, no. 1/2, pp. 43-79 |
https://doi.org/10.17578/10-1/2-2
Jason Mitchell
, University of Michigan Business School, U.S.A
Corresponding Author
Email: acjason@umich.edu
H. Y. Izan
, University of Western Australia, Australia
Roslinda Lim
, Macquarie University, Australia
Abstract:
A compelling reason for engaging in on-market buy-backs is that it provides a signal about the undervaluation of the company. In this paper an alternative, accounting based, method of determining fundamental value and undervaluation is used, namely the Ohlson residual income valuation framework. It is found that prior to the announcement buy-back companies are significantly undervalued relative to comparable non-buy-back companies. This undervaluation is largely but not totally removed in the period immediately following the on-market buy-back implying on-market buy-backs are predominantly an effective signaling mechanism. Where the firm cites undervaluation as a specific motive for the buy-back then, in fact, a higher degree of undervaluation prior to the buy-back is evident. The results provide evidence that management can, and does, identify undervaluation and reduces this through the signaling mechanism of on-market buy-backs.
Keywords : buy-backs; undervaluation; fundamental value
View in Bib TeX Format
View Cite Format 1
View Cite Format 2
Download Article 239.03 Kb
Defining and Dating Bull and Bear Markets: Two Centuries of Evidence
Multinational Finance Journal, 2006, vol. 10, no. 1/2, pp. 81-116 |
https://doi.org/10.17578/10-1/2-3
Liliana Gonzalez
, University of Rhode Island, USA
Corresponding Author
Email: liliana@cs.uri.edu
Philip Hoang
, Australian National University, Australia
John G. Powell Massey
, University, New Zealand
Jing Shi
, Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, China and The Australian National University, Australia
Abstract:
A compelling reason for engaging in on-market buy-backs is that it provides a signal about the undervaluation of the company. In this paper an alternative, accounting based, method of determining fundamental value and undervaluation is used, namely the Ohlson residual income valuation framework. It is found that prior to the announcement buy-back companies are significantly undervalued relative to comparable non-buy-back companies. This undervaluation is largely but not totally removed in the period immediately following the on-market buy-back implying on-market buy-backs are predominantly an effective signaling mechanism. Where the firm cites undervaluation as a specific motive for the buy-back then, in fact, a higher degree of undervaluation prior to the buy-back is evident. The results provide evidence that management can, and does, identify undervaluation and reduces this through the signaling mechanism of on-market buy-backs.
Keywords : stock market; bulls and bears; turning point dating
View in Bib TeX Format
View Cite Format 1
View Cite Format 2
Download Article 362.91 Kb
Does Total Risk Matter? The Case of Emerging Markets
Multinational Finance Journal, 2006, vol.10, no. 1/2, pp. 117-151 |
https://doi.org/10.17578/10-1/2-4
Eric Girard
, Siena College, U.S.A.
Corresponding Author
Email: egirard@siena.edu
Amit Sinha
, Indiana State University, U.S.A.
Abstract:
This paper examines the relationships between market risk premiums, time-varying variance and covariance in forty-eight emerging, and seven developed capital markets. We allow each market’s risk premium generating process to be state-dependent by accounting for negative and positive market price of variance and covariance risk. We find that half of the emerging markets exhibit reward to world variance while for the other half are only sensitive to local risk factors. We also find evidence of a negative relationship between reward to local risk and reward to world risk. Accordingly, the relative importance of one reward versus the other depends on the ever-changing correlation with the world market. Finally, we show that correlation is not a factor that explains reward to local risk in few segmented capital markets
Keywords : reward to risk; conditional risk; market price of risk; multivariate GARCH
View in Bib TeX Format
View Cite Format 1
View Cite Format 2
Download Article 158.68 Kb
The Equivalence of Causality Detection in VAR and VECM Modeling with Applications to Exchange Rates
Multinational Finance Journal, 2006, vol. 10, no. 3/4, pp. 153-177 |
https://doi.org/10.17578/10-3/4-1
T.J. Brailsford
, UQ Business School, University of Queensland, Australia
Corresponding Author
Email: n/a
J. H.W. Penm
, The Australian National University, Australia
R.D. Terrell
, The Australian National University, Australia
Abstract:
Vector error-correction models (VECM) are increasingly being used to capture dynamic relationships between financial variables. Estimation and interpretation of such models can be enhanced if zero restrictions are allowed in the coefficient matrices. Specifically, in tests of indirect causality and/or Granger non-causality in a VECM, the efficiency of the causality detection is crucially dependent upon finding zero coefficient entries where the true structure does indeed include zero entries. Such a VECM is referred to as a zero-non-zero (ZNZ) patterned VECM and includes full-order models. Recent advances have shown how ZNZ patterns can be explicitly recognized in a VECM and used to provide an effective means of detecting Granger-causality, Granger non-causality and indirect causality. This paper develops a general approach and framework for I(d) integrated systems. We show that causality detection in an I(d) system can be discovered identically from the ZNZ patterned VECM’s or the equivalent VAR models.
Keywords : error correction models; VAR; granger causality; purchasing power parity
View in Bib TeX Format
View Cite Format 1
View Cite Format 2
Download Article 342.86 Kb
Risk Management in Emerging Markets: Practical Methodologies and Empirical Tests
Multinational Finance Journal, 2006, vol. 10, no. 3/4, pp. 179-221 |
https://doi.org/10.17578/10-3/4-2
Marios Nerouppos
, Cyprus International Institute of Management, Cyprus
Corresponding Author
Email: n/a
David Saunders
, University of Waterloo, Canada
Costas Xiouros
, University of Southern California, U.S.A.
Stavros A. Zenios
, University of Cyprus, Cyprus
Abstract:
Risk management has undergone a remarkable transformation over the past fifteen years, with most new methods having been designed for the concerns of large institutions operating in well-developed financial markets. This paper addresses a problem faced by smaller institutions operating in emerging markets, namely the significant lack of data. As many risk management techniques are data intensive, this problem may seem insurmountable. This paper introduces a new method, enriched historical simulation, which supplements the data in an emerging market with data from other markets. The principle behind this methodology is that when many markets are considered, the essence of emerging market economies comes to the fore, with local idiosyncrasies being washed out. This principle is illustrated on the problem of estimating Value-at-Risk on the Cyprus and Athens Stock Exchanges.
Keywords : risk management; historical simulation; value-at-risk; emerging markets
View in Bib TeX Format
View Cite Format 1
View Cite Format 2
Download Article 114.5 Kb
The Long-Run Stock Performance of Privatization IPOs
Multinational Finance Journal, 2006, vol. 10, no. 3/4, pp. 223-250 |
https://doi.org/10.17578/10-3/4-3
Seung-Doo Choi
, Dongeui University, Korea
Corresponding Author
Email: mm@deu.ac.kr
Sang-Koo Nam
, Korea University, Korea
Abstract:
This paper compares the long-run buy-and-hold returns of privatization initial public offerings (IPOs) to those of the domestic stock markets of respective countries using a sample of 241 privatization IPOs from 41 countries. The evidence indicates that the privatization IPOs significantly outperform their domestic stock markets if the returns are equally-weighted while value-weighted returns show a sharp reduction in performance. However, there are substantial variations in the long-run performance of privatization IPOs across industries, issuing countries, issue period, and the origin of commercial law of the country. This paper also analyzes the cross-sectional determinants of the long-run buy-and-hold returns of privatization shares. The results indicate that the long-run performance of privatization IPOs is significantly related to the proxies of policy uncertainty, consistent with the signaling models of Perotti (1995). Such effects appear to be overwhelming in the earlier post-IPO period, while the traditional market factors become more important as the policy uncertainty disappears over time. The institutional features of the country such as accounting standards, origin of commercial law, and corporate governance scheme also affect the return performance of privatization issues.
Keywords : privatization; IPO; policy uncertainty;CAR; BHAR
View in Bib TeX Format
View Cite Format 1
View Cite Format 2
Download Article 112.11 Kb
Closed-End Country Funds and International Diversification
Multinational Finance Journal, 2006, vol. 10, no. 3/4, pp. 251-276 |
https://doi.org/10.17578/10-3/4-4
Andreas Charitou
, University of Cyprus, Cyprus
Corresponding Author
Email: charitou@ucy.ac.cy
Andreas Makris
, University of Cyprus, Cyprus
George P. Nishiotis
, University of Cyprus, Cyprus
Abstract:
Using data from 1993 to 2002 for eight developed and fifteen emerging markets, we find that return correlations, mean-variance spanning, and Sharpe ratio tests support that closed-end country funds (CECF) can mimic their corresponding foreign indices, and that they are more heavily influenced by their corresponding local markets instead of the U.S. market. This implies that U.S. investors, by investing in CECF, can achieve similar international diversification benefits to those achieved by investing directly in the foreign indices. We also document increased correlation between the U.S. market and foreign markets during this period and find no compelling evidence of economically and statistically significant international diversification benefits, as opposed to a pre 1993 period. These findings could be associated with the financial market liberalization that was prevalent during the period
Keywords : closed-end country funds; international diversification; emerging markets; liberalization; spanning tests
View in Bib TeX Format
View Cite Format 1
View Cite Format 2
Download Article 249.17 Kb
The Valuation of Options on Bonds with Default Risk
Multinational Finance Journal, 2006, vol.10, no.3/4, pp. 277-305 |
https://doi.org/10.17578/10-3/4-5
Riadh Belhaj
, Conservatoire National des Arts et Métiers, France
Corresponding Author
Email: n/a
Abstract:
In this paper we present a model for valuing European and American options, which incorporates both default and interest rate risks. We develop a framework that permits evaluation of three kinds of options: (i) options issued by default-free counterparties on risky bonds, (ii) options issued by risky counterparties on default-free bonds and (iii) options issued by risky counterparties on risky bonds — a case where default risk enters at both levels. We show that the price of a put option on a risky discount bond is hump shaped for a European put and monotone increasing for an American put. We also find that the price impact of default risk is less for an American put option than for a European one.
Keywords : option pricing; default risk; defaultable bonds; vulnerable options
View in Bib TeX Format
View Cite Format 1
View Cite Format 2
Copyright © 2010. All rights reserved. Multinational Finace Society. Design and Development by:
Exarsis Business Solutions Ltd.
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
.