Home
|
The Society
|
Membership
|
Board of Directors
|
Multinational Finance Journal
|
Annual Conferences
Search
Date Range
in
Title
Author
Abstract
Full Text
Keywords
All Years
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
to:
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Forthcoming Articles
Published Articles
Volume 28 (2024)
Volume 28, Numbers 3 & 4
38-75 (September/December 2024)
Volume 28, Numbers 1 & 2
Pages 1-37 (March/June 2018)
Volume 26 (2023)
Volume 27, Numbers 3 & 4
48-66 (September/December 2023)
Volume 27, Numbers 1 & 2
1-47 (March/June 2023)
Volume 26 (2022)
Volume 26, Numbers 3 & 4
27-59 (September/December 2022)
Volume 26, Numbers 1 & 2
1-26 (March/June 2022)
Volume 25 (2021)
Volume 25, Numbers 3 & 4
(September/December 2021)
Volume 25, Numbers 1 & 2
(March/June 2021)
Volume 24 (2020)
Volume 24, Numbers 3 & 4
Pages 119-266 (September/December 2020)
Volume 24, Numbers 1 & 2
Pages 1-117 (March/June 2020)
Volume 23 (2019)
Volume 23, Numbers 3 & 4
Pages 141-272 (September/December 2019)
Volume 23, Numbers 1 & 2
Pages 1-139 (March/June 2019)
Volume 22 (2018)
Volume 22, Numbers 3 & 4
Pages 119-254 (September/December 2018)
Volume 22, Numbers 1 & 2
Pages 1-118 (March/June 2018)
Volume 21 (2017)
Volume 21, Number 4
Pages 211-283 (December 2017)
Volume 21, Number 3
Pages 133-210 (September 2017)
Volume 21, Number 2
Pages 49-132 (June 2017)
Volume 21, Number 1
Pages 1-48 (March 2017)
Volume 20 (2016)
Volume 20, Number 4
Pages 273-354 (December 2016)
Volume 20, Number 3
Pages 181-271 (September 2016)
Volume 20, Number 2
Pages 85-179 (June 2016)
Volume 20, Number 1
Pages 1-83 (March 2016)
Volume 19 (2015)
Volume 19, Number 4
Pages 223-313 (December 2015)
Volume 19, Number 3
Pages 149-221 (September 2015)
Volume 19, Number 2
Pages 77-147 (June 2015)
Volume 19, Number 1
Pages 1-75 (March 2015)
Volume 18 (2014)
Volume 18, Numbers 3 & 4
Pages 169-336 (September/December 2014)
Volume 18, Numbers 1 & 2
Pages 1-167 (March/June 2014)
Volume 17 (2013)
Volume 17, Numbers 3 & 4
Pages 149-369 (September/December 2013)
Volume 17, Numbers 1 & 2
Pages 1-148 (March/June 2013)
Volume 16 (2012)
Volume 16, Numbers 3 & 4
Pages 155-301 (September/December 2012)
Volume 16, Numbers 1 & 2
Pages 1-154 (March/June 2012)
Volume 15 (2011)
Volume 15, Numbers 3 & 4
Pages 157-296 (September/December 2011)
Volume 15, Numbers 1 & 2
Pages 1-156 (March/June 2011)
Volume 14 (2010)
Volume 14, Numbers 3 & 4
Pages 153-317 (September/December 2010)
Volume 14, Numbers 1 & 2
Pages 1-151 (March/June 2010)
Volume 13 (2009)
Volume 13, Numbers 3 & 4
Pages 155-321 (September/December 2009)
Volume 13, Numbers 1 & 2
Pages 1-154 (March/June 2009)
Volume 12 (2008)
Volume 12, Numbers 3 & 4
Pages 157-312 (September/December 2008)
Volume 12, Numbers 1 & 2
Pages 1-155 (March/June 2008)
Volume 11 (2007)
Volume 11, Numbers 3 & 4
Pages 157-322 (September/December 2007)
Volume 11, Numbers 1 & 2
Pages 1-156 (March/June 2007)
Volume 10 (2006)
Volume 10, Numbers 3 & 4
Pages 153-305 (September/December 2006)
Volume 10, Numbers 1 & 2
Pages 1-151 (March/June 2006)
Volume 9 (2005)
Volume 9, Numbers 3 & 4
Pages 131-269 (September/December 2005)
Volume 9, Numbers 1 & 2
Pages 1-130 (March/June 2005)
Volume 8 (2004)
Volume 8, Numbers 3 & 4
Pages 141-274 (September/December 2004)
Volume 8, Numbers 1 & 2
Pages 1-139 (March/June 2004)
Volume 7 (2003)
Volume 7, Numbers 3 & 4
Pages 107-230 (September/December 2003)
Volume 7, Numbers 1 & 2
Pages 1-106 (March/June 2003)
Volume 6 (2002)
Volume 6, Numbers 3 & 4
Pages 131-258 (September/December 2002)
Volume 6, Number 2
Pages 65-130 (June 2002)
Volume 6, Number 1
Pages 1-63 (March 2002)
Volume 5 (2001)
Volume 5, Number 4
Pages 225-311 (December 2001)
Volume 5, Number 3
Pages 155-224 (September 2001)
Volume 5, Number 2
Pages 87-154 (June 2001)
Volume 5, Number 1
Pages 1-86 (March 2001)
Volume 4 (2000)
Volume 4, Numbers 3 & 4
Pages 159-288 (September/December 2000)
Volume 4, Numbers 1 & 2
Pages 5-153 (March/June 2000)
Volume 3 (1999)
Volume 3, Number 4
Pages 223-282 (December 1999)
Volume 3, Number 3
Pages 147-221 (September 1999)
Volume 3, Number 2
Pages 71-145 (June 1999)
Volume 3, Number 1
Pages 1-70 (March 1999)
Volume 2 (1998)
Volume 2, Number 4
Pages 245-310 (December 1998)
Volume 2, Number 3
Pages 167-244 (September 1998)
Volume 2, Number 2
Pages 85-165 (June 1998)
Volume 2, Number 1
Pages 1-83 (March 1998)
Volume 1 (1997)
Volume 1, Number 4
Pages 255-324 (December 1997)
Volume 1, Number 3
Pages 169-254 (September 1997)
Volume 1, Number 2
Pages 93-168 (June 1997)
Volume 1, Number 1
Pages 1-80 (March 1997)
Forthcoming Articles
()
General Information
()
Published Articles By Year
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
1997 - 2025
Volume 8, Numbers 1 & 2 / March/June 2004 , Pages 1-139
Download Article 258.43 Kb
Price and Volume Effects Associated with Changes in the Danish Blue-Chip Index: The KFX Index
Multinational Finance Journal, 2004, vol. 8, no. 1 & 2, pp. 3-34 |
https://doi.org/10.17578/8-1/2-1
Ken L. Bechmann
, Copenhagen Business School, Denmark
Corresponding Author
Email: kb.fi@cbs.dk
Abstract:
This paper considers the effects of changes in the composition of the Danish blue-chip KFX index for the period of 1989-2001. Consistent with the selection criterion used for the index, there is no evidence for a stock price effect at the announcement of a change in the index. However, deleted stocks experience an abnormal return averaging –13% in a six-month period before the deletion and a decrease in trading volume and efficiency of stock prices following the deletion. For added stocks, the average abnormal return is 8% and there is no significant change in trading volume or efficiency. These long-run effects are best explained by the imperfect substitutes hypothesis or the information costs/liquidity hypothesis, suggesting that stocks in the KFX Index are exposed to a higher demand or more attention and a lower cost of trading than stocks outside the index. However, the results do not rule out the possibility that part of the stock price effect is due to the selection criterion used for the KFX Index. All in all, this paper documents that the selection criterion for and the size of an index as well as the size of the related stock market are relevant when explaining the stock market effects of index revisions.
Keywords : index composition; selection criterion; price and liquidity effects
View in Bib TeX Format
View Cite Format 1
View Cite Format 2
Download Article 238.18 Kb
Takeover Prediction Models and Portfolio Strategies: A Multinomial Approach
Multinational Finance Journal, 2004, vol. 8, no. 1 & 2, pp. 35-72 |
https://doi.org/10.17578/8-1/2-2
Ronan G. Powell
, University of New South Wales, Australia
Corresponding Author
Email: r.powell@unsw.edu.au
Abstract:
This paper uses a multinomial framework to develop several takeover prediction models. The motivation for this approach lies with Morck, Shleifer and Vishny (1988), who note that separate considerations are appropriate for predicting which firms are subject to hostile (disciplinary) and friendly (synergistic) takeovers in the USA. In a typical binomial setting, in which takeover targets are treated as belonging to one homogenous group, differences between hostile and friendly targets are ignored. This may result in biased takeover probabilities and poor predictive performance. Using UK data, the results from this paper show that the characteristics of hostile and friendly targets do differ, particularly in terms of firm size. The multinomial models also have higher significance and explanatory power when compared to the binomial models. Furthermore, when the models are tested in an investment portfolio setting, the results suggest that a strategy of predicting hostile targets only, beats a benchmark control portfolio of firms of a similar size and market-to-book.
Keywords : multinomial logit; takeover prediction; abnormal returns; size effect
View in Bib TeX Format
View Cite Format 1
View Cite Format 2
Download Article 208.54 Kb
Performance Consequences of Privatizing Egyptian State-Owned Enterprises: The Effect of Post-Privatization Ownership Structure on Firm Performance
Multinational Finance Journal, 2004, vol. 8, no. 1 & 2, pp. 73-114 |
https://doi.org/10.17578/8-1/2-3
Mohammed Omran
, Arab Academy for Science & Technology, Egypt and Arab Monetary Fund, U.A.E.
Corresponding Author
Email: momran@aast.edu
Abstract:
This paper evaluates the financial and operating performance of newly privatized Egyptian state-owned enterprises and determines whether such performance differs across firms according to their new ownership structure. The Egyptian privatization program provides unique post-privatization data on different ownership structures. Since most studies do not distinguish between the types of ownership, this paper provides new insight into the impact that post-privatization ownership structure has on firm performance. The study covers 69 firms, which were privatized between 1994 and 1998. For these newly privatized firms, this study documents significant increases in profitability, operating efficiency, capital expenditures, and dividends. Conversely, significant decreases in employment, leverage, and risk are found, although output shows an insignificant decrease following privatization. The empirical results also show that Egyptian state-owned enterprises, which were sold to anchor-investors and employee shareholder associations, seem to outperform other types of privatization, such as minority and majority initial public offerings.
Keywords : privatization; SOEs; Egypt; and ownership structure
View in Bib TeX Format
View Cite Format 1
View Cite Format 2
Download Article 196.87 Kb
Share Price Reaction to Dividend Announcements: Empirical Evidence on the Signaling Model from the Oslo Stock Exchange
Multinational Finance Journal, 2004, vol.8, no.1 & 2, pp. 115-139 |
https://doi.org/10.17578/8-1/2-4
John Capstaff
, University of Strathclyde, U.K.
Corresponding Author
Email: j.capstaff@strath.ac.uk
Audun Klæboe
, Nordea Bank, Norway
Andrew P. Marshall
, University of Strathclyde, U.K.
Abstract:
This study tests the signaling theory of dividends by investigating the stock price reaction to dividend announcements on the Oslo Stock Exchange (OSE), and subsequent changes in the cash flows of the firms involved. This paper adds to existing evidence by examining the role of dividends in a market where the corporate ownership structure is notably different from the U.S. and the U.K., and where the motivation to use dividends as a signaling mechanism appears to be stronger. The results indicate significant abnormal stock returns are associated with announcements of dividend changes. The results are robust to alternative models of dividend expectations, after controlling for the impact of earnings announcements, and are consistent across sub-periods in the sample. The stock market reaction is most pronounced for large, positive dividend announcements that are followed by permanent cash flow increases. This evidence provides modest support for the signaling theory of dividends in Norway, but it does not support the proposition that corporate ownership structure is an important influence on the use of dividends as a signaling mechanism.
Keywords : dividend announcements, Oslo stock exchange; signaling
View in Bib TeX Format
View Cite Format 1
View Cite Format 2
Copyright © 2010. All rights reserved. Multinational Finace Society. Design and Development by:
Exarsis Business Solutions Ltd.
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
.